Author: cosmo

06/06/2006

Man, our house is really stuffy tonight for some reason. It’s been hot the past few days, and we tend not to use the air-conditioning much, but at night normally it cools off nicely. It turns out that tonight in particular it’s cooler outside than inside, and I have some work-related things to do on the laptop. I was kind of grumpy because I was uncomfortably hot, and Laralee suggested I just take the laptop outside.

So I did. I’m sitting in the backyard now, under the half-moon sky, hacking away. Nice!

06/03/2006

I’ve been having discussions with friends (and Laralee) about the Marriage Protection Amendment, which will be up for vote in the U.S. Senate next week. I was a little surprised to find that people I talk to support it; I think it’s a terrible idea.

On a whim, I wrote to my senators to tell them my views:

Sen. Allard and Sen. Salazar:

I’m writing to express some thoughts on the Marriage Protection Amendment scheduled for a vote next week. I do not support the amendment, and feel it will be detrimental in many ways:

1) In my opinion, the government has absolutely no right, nor authority, to meddle in affairs like this. The purpose of the government is to provide for the safety and security of its citizens– nothing more, nothing less. I am against any expansion of government powers, particularly in the arena of personal relationships.

2) Under the Constitution, states’ rights supercede federal rights unless specifically stated in the Constitution. That model was wisely incorporated by the Founding Fathers because they intentionally wanted to avoid a powerful federal government (like the one that ruled the Colonies). This amendment turns that general rule on its head by granting the federal government dominance over states’ rights, and I think that’s a dangerous road.

3) A constitutional amendment will have little or no direct effect on same-sex couples already in committed relationships. If I was gay (I’m not) and living with my partner, I see no reason why I’d suddenly break up with him because of this amendment. Thus, it does absolutely nothing to address the real issue– it merely pushes it farther underground.

Let me be clear that I do not support gay marriage– but I feel that addressing this sensitive issue can be done in different ways, and a constitutional amendment is not an appropriate choice.

Respectfully,
Jeff Schroeder
Longmont CO

I doubt it will do much good, since Sen. Allard is the author of the amendment, but if nothing else I let them know that at least one of their constituents doesn’t support their approach.

06/02/2006

So I ran the annual Bolder Boulder 10-km Memorial Day race, and today they sent my photos. Of course they take pictures of pretty much everyone– all 52,000 of us– and then hope we’ll all pay twenty clams to buy a nice 8×10″ print. But hey, at least I can have a teensy digital picture of myself huffing and puffing along the race route.

So below is a nice before-and-after shot: me with my friend Sean (who ran much, much faster than I did) before the race, and me chugging toward the finish line.

And I did manage to beat my goal: my official time was 58:46. Nothing to brag about, I suppose, but considering I never trained and don’t race any other time during the year, it’s also not too shabby.

06/02/2006

My expertise has just been called into play on a matter of the most sensitive national security. The fate of the world lies in the balance, and I must solve this cryptic puzzle!

(Okay, truthfully my friend Bech sent this to me and expects my answer by Monday…)

06/02/2006

This article from today’s edition of The Register is so funny I’m just going to quote it verbatim:

Those readers who have kids and are waiting with tredipation for the day when their offspring ask the question every parent dreads will be relieved to know they can now direct inquisitive minds to a Canadian website guaranteed to take the embarrassment out of that most sensitive of subjects.

So, when little Johnny finally asks “Dad, where does intellectual property come from?”, there’s no need to fake an urgent appointment and rush from the room with a quick “ask your mother”, because Captain Copyright is on hand to set the record straight.

And how. Try the unexpurgated glossary of copyright terms, the heartwarming Story of Captain Copyright, or the educational Copyright Quiz which kicks off with: “You wrote a poem for class. Do you have to register it with the Copyright Board of Canada for your poem to be protected by copyright law? Yes or No?”

Oh yeah, and here’s a fun fact about Canadian copyright guaranteed to burn itself indelibly into any developing brain: “Ottawa in 1889 passed an act requiring that, in order to secure Canadian copyright, a book would have to be published in Canada within one month of its publication elsewhere; otherwise, that book (in intent, that American book) would be considered common property in Canada, which meant it could be re-published without penalty by any Canadian firm.”

Yes, I tried that one on my own 14-year-old son and he immediately jumped from the sofa where he’d been punishing his Playstation and declared: “Dad, forget that quad bike I wanted for Christmas. Get me a book on Canadian copyright law instead because I see now that when I grow up I want to be an intellectual property lawyer and make the world a safer, better place for my children and my children’s children.”

Thank you, Captain Copyright!

The site itself is available in all its glory at www.captaincopyright.ca. Whee!

06/02/2006

I goofed up my taxes for 2003 and 2004 (and only figured out they were wrong when I did the 2005 return!) so I had to file some corrective paperwork with the IRS. The resulting envelope of goodies was pretty hefty, so I figured I’d slap two stamps on it and send it on its way. Yesterday I received the envelope in the mail with a note that I owed nine cents of additional postage.

Luckily for me– because I was in a smart-aleck mood– I had a bunch of one-cent stamps laying around.

06/01/2006

“The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting.”

— Charles Bukowski

06/01/2006

So today I had a conundrum: it’s Thursday, which means (of course) there’s pickup ultimate at lunch time. But I went to Zack’s preschool “graduation” party, and then Alex and Kyra’s last-day-of-school party, and wasn’t going to be able to catch the e-mail saying whether the game was a go. (We use an advanced system whereby everyone RSVP’s to a single guy about the game, and then he reports if we have enough players.)

Thinking about how I might find out the result, the light bulb of inspiration was lit and I created a mail filter that forwarded all ultimate-related e-mail messages to my cell phone– which of course I had with me at the parties. So there I was, sitting on the school lawn with the kids, and my cell phone chimed with a text message “game on”. Woo hoo!

I’m so clever.