11/28/2004

From a long missive on Kiro5hin by Roger Williams, where he discussed (among other things) the building of the atomic bomb:

Perhaps the biggest myth of the American national character is that we are the Good Guys.

Whenever this atomic subject comes up and my views come out I often get some pretty hostile responses. I think it’s because it’s hard, it takes a real shock to the system, to admit to yourself that your country didn’t just needlessly and horribly kill a few hundred thousand people; your country does stuff like that all the time. To recognize the magnitude of the problem is to realize that we are not, in fact, the Good Guys. And that’s a very traumatic thing to have to accept.

From America’s beginning we have been a nation of high ideals but low values. We’re the kind of nation that can accept the 3/5 compromise on slavery right after ratifying a document that says “all men are created equal.” We can hear something like the Dred Scott decision and most of us are fully capable of saying “sure, that makes perfect sense.” Then we can have a big old knock-down drag-out civil war on the issue that kills a few million people, as we trip over ourselves finding ever newer and cleverer ways to kill each other. Then we can pick silly fights like the Spanish-American war just because we don’t have anything else to do.

In a sense it was an accident that we came out of WWII looking like the Good Guys; it helped that we were sneak-attacked and that the Germans really went out of their way to make us look good by comparison. Under other circumstances the atomic bombings of two inhabited cities would have been roundly and widely criticized. But it seems that Teflon, which was invented for sealing surfaces at the Y-12 diffusion plant (not as popularly believed for the Apollo space program) kept the dirt of our misdeeds from sticking even before we started to apply it to cookware.

We went on after WWII to do a lot of Not Very Good Guy things, from the Cold War missile buildup to the Cuban Missile Crisis to Vietnam to Iran/Contra to Iraq. Now there’s a typically American approach to something we don’t understand very well; befriend both sides in a nasty long-standing conflict and then screw them both over! How to win friends and influence people, American style. When you’ve got the world by the tail you can do whatever you want.

Now as interesting things go, building the atomic bomb is one of the most interesting things ever to happen, and the fact that we still argue about it sixty years later is a testament to just how interesting it is. But it also isn’t a very Good Guy thing to have done. And America tends to be cool with things like that, even if we saw too many John Ford movies to admit we’re wearing the black hats in this show.

11/28/2004

Tonight was the night… Christmas decorations are going up. Once the outside temperature goes above the teens, I’ll probably get out there and take care of the lights. For now we’ll have to be satisfied with the tree and various holiday decor around the house.

11/28/2004

Last night was one of those magical winter nights… there was fresh snow on the ground, and the moon was a couple days past full and out in all its glory. The night was so bright that, in Laralee’s words, you didn’t need headlights to drive. It was bright enough you could read a book at midnight. Coupled with the quiet muffled peace of a snowy night, it was wonderful (although cold) to just stand outside.

It reminded me very much of the classic line, “The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow / Gave a lustre of midday to objects below…”

11/27/2004

Laralee and I watched “Footloose” about a week ago, and thoroughly enjoyed the music (if not the cheesy plot). Today, she was listening to Christmas music while she worked in the kitchen, and Kyra and Zack were both dancing in the family room. It was funny to watch because it was just like the movie: Kyra was obviously the accomplished dancer, and Zack was trying to copy her moves. He’d watch her and then try it himself and (no surprise, since he has my genes) fail miserably. Still, very cute.

Finally he gave up emulating her and just went into his usual: the ever-popular Epileptic Seizure Dance.

11/25/2004

I made a batch of chocolate cookies the other day. I’d been craving them for a while, so I finally called Mom and got the recipe. Unfortunately, I think I need to change something in the recipe to account for the high altitude, because instead of nice puffy cookies I ended up with a single large chocolate sheet about an eighth of an inch thick…

11/19/2004

Seen on Slashdot:

Laws are designed to help us co-exist with each other, to respect one another and bring order and a set of rules to abide by so that we can pool in our interests and progress as a civilization. People or “things” like RIAA and MPAA abuse these laws, which were written to help bring progress. They abuse them into filling their coffers with wealth that is meaningless when it does not really help anybody. More so when it happens at the expense of others, and at the expense of progress.

I sincerely hope that one day our society is rid of parasitic savages of the likes of MPAA and RIAA. They’re the scum and a disgrace of our civilization. They are the true deterrents to progress.

Amen, brother!

11/19/2004

Today’s idiotic spam award goes to the guy who represents fabulously wealthy people who want to invest in my company.

Of course there’s the usual… they’ve got cash:

Total amount to be invested
$75,000,000,00.usd………………………….Cash investment.

But, in a rare twist, they also have:

4Metric tons of AU in
dust………………………Treasure investment.

Sweet! Four metric tons of gold powder! I can load that into a fertilizer spreader and make my lawn all shiny or something.

11/18/2004

On a Linux newsgroup, of all places, there’s been a two-day discussion about the famous Monty Hall Paradox. From the UC-San Diego math department comes this explanation of the problem:

The particular game that we are concerned with here is where Monty Hall offers you the opportunity to win what is behind one of three doors. Typically there was a really nice prize (i.e., a car) behind one of the doors and a not-so-nice prize (i.e., a goat) behind the other two. After selecting a door, Monty would then proceed to open one of the doors you didn’t select. It is important to note here that Monty would not open the door that concealed the car. At this point, he would then ask you if you wanted to switch to the other door before revealing what you had won.

Apparently in September 1991, a clever reader wrote to Marilyn vos Savant (reputedly one of the smartest humans alive) and presented this problem. She answered that you should switch your choice to the other door and thus double your chance of winning. Apparently thousands of people wrote to her and said she was flat wrong, and that in fact your chance of winning remained 50-50 because there were now two doors from which to select.

It makes your brain hurt to think about, but the math shows irrefutably that if you pick the other door your odds of winning are 66%, compared with 33% if you’re stubborn and remain with your original choice.

Now if I could just find someone with three doors, two goats, and a nice car…