Year: 2006

04/13/2006

Our neighbors bought a copy of King Kong on DVD and loaned it to us this week. Laralee wanted to watch it; I wasn’t very excited about it but decided to humor her.

If I had to describe the movie in a word, that word would be

SUCKED

The first hour was pretty good– lots of suspense, wondering what mystery awaits our heroes, as well as some interesting character development. Then we hit the second hour, which was like a journey to Land of the Lost, with cheesy dinosaurs and even cheesier giant bugs and creepy-crawlies attacking our heroes in a non-stop tide of overdone special effects. The third hour recovered a little, but you just wanted to scream at the characters because of how inane they were being. When Kong finally fell a hundred stories to his death, I can’t say I shed a tear… except maybe the tears of happiness that the movie was finally over.

Ugh.

04/08/2006

The House of Representatives Government Reform Committee issued its annual Federal Computer Security Report Card, and let’s say the Gov isn’t doing so well when it comes to security. The complete summary, shown below, indicates that the federal government in general rates a miserable D+ in the arena of protecting their computers.

There are some departments and agencies who appear to do quite well, but the entire right-hand column is staggeringly abysmal. The Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security both scored failing grades… they’re some of the worst offenders, and ironically they probably have the most sensitive information to protect!

Amazing.

04/08/2006

From today’s New York Times:

An internal staff report by the United States Embassy and the military command in Baghdad provides a sobering province-by-province snapshot of Iraq’s political, economic and security situation, rating the overall stability of 6 of the 18 provinces “serious” and one “critical.” The report is a counterpoint to some recent upbeat public statements by top American politicians and military officials.

Shocking, simply shocking. Not only are things pretty bad in Iraq, but problems aren’t being discussed by the “upbeat” people running the show.

04/07/2006

As a follow-up to yesterday’s news about the immigration bill in the Senate, it looks like a few of our esteemed senators have had a sudden inexplicable infusion of brain cells, and voted down the measure 60-38.

Today’s tally:

Supporters of immigration reform : 0
Common sense : 1

04/06/2006

The coolest picture you’ll see today:

A photo from the International Space Station showing the total solar eclipse of March 29 as the shadow of the moon passes over Turkey.

04/06/2006

Today the Senate agreed on a landmark bill dealing with immigration. Here are some quotes from The New York Times describing the proposed changes:

Under the agreement, illegal immigrants who have lived here for five years or more– about seven million people– would eventually be granted citizenship if they remained employed, paid fines and back taxes and learned English.

Okay, that sounds pretty good in principle, but I find it hard to believe that seven million migrant workers would be willing to pay at least five years’ worth of back taxes, additional fines, and become proficient in English. The financial burden alone would make it nearly impossible, much less the requirement to learn another language. They can just remain where they are, doing what they’re doing, speaking Spanish (or whatever) and avoiding the IRS.

Illegal immigrants who have lived here from two to five years– about three million people– would have to leave the country briefly and return as temporary workers. They would also be eligible for citizenship over time, but they would have to wait several years longer for it.

Ooh, that will work well. I’m sure it’s no big deal to deport three million people. It’s working so well with the current laws, right? Perhaps the lawmakers are assuming these immigrants will hear about the new law and decide, “Hey, that sounds great! Let’s pack up all our stuff, go back across the border, wait a while, and then come back to America.” Again, the financial burden is going to be a deal-breaker.

Those immigrants who have been here less than two years– about one million people– would be required to leave the country. They could apply for spots in the temporary worker program, but there would be no guarantee.

Umm, yeah. Because once again we all know how effective our border control has been for the past few decades. Why do the senators believe some new legislation that declares “if you fall within this category, you need to leave now” will suddenly work?

I don’t have an astounding solution for the whole issue, but it seems clear to me this “landmark bill” is just another piece of worthless legislation designed to cater to voters and make our Congresspersons look like they actually care about something besides corporate greed and pork-barrel projects.

I’m such a cynic.